Search This Blog

Nov 8, 2015

Week 3 - Feedback and Goals



Week three, and it was a trying, yet triumphant one. Although it may have been plagued by personal and professional overload, at the end of the day, I feel that I handled it well. I didn’t find myself engaging in overly emotional reactions to others despite the fact that there was so much work to be done and my husband was 1,800 miles away being admitted to the hospital for acute renal failure due to kidney stones lodging in his bladder and urethral tubes. I think that the testing of what I could handle and how I would react…especially after the turbulence I endured at work last week was somewhat monumentally successful! Although I was mentally worn out, I set goals for myself to focus on the work that needed to be completed, the preparation of what was required to transport my husband from Las Vegas back to Florida in order for him to receive surgery and post-operative care, as well as conclude several small projects that continued to land on my desk to the lacking professionalism that continues to take place in adjacent departments. The projects were turned in, the results provided timely, and in addition and most importantly, as of today, my husband is home and recovering well!

This week we found that feedback and goal-setting truly should be considered as two parts of the same dynamic. As our reading provided for thought this week, “…giving feedback on performance without having…goals does not lead to improved performance” (Brown, 2011, p. 321). Moreover, feedback that is specific, timely, and given in a manner that provides relevancy is essential towards achieving optimal results in relation to goal setting and is a necessary condition in which we cannot ignore the correlation between the two (Erez, 1977). In fact, one would be able to easily argue the absurdity that exists in which one would be willing to set goals and not seek out or provide feedback; it would be an exercise in complete utility to not be able to see how one directly impacts the other, and vice versa.

For example, how would athletes be able to train without knowing what benchmarks to try to accomplish? How would students be able to demonstrate understanding of scholastic materials and achievement without grades? How would we know when our temperature was demonstrating the fighting of a disease, virus, or bacteria if we didn’t have a normalized core body temperature of 98.6 degrees? Without knowing what is expected, there is no way in which we are able to measure or balance our efforts towards what we are attempting to achieve. As our reading unfolded to us, “frequent, relevant, and specific feedback is important for goal setting to be a success” (Brown, 2011, p. 321), and in the absence of feedback from others, we have no way in which for our efforts to be managed, coached, or weighed towards what we are trying to accomplish.

I know that when I am working out on a regular basis, and at the end of our nine-week training cycle, I have a number in my mind…my magic number…in which is what I am aiming to hit on our max-effort 1 time lift the following week. I know exactly how it feels when I set out to deadlift 200-pounds and was able to pull 225-pounds off the floor for the very first time---it was exhilarating and fascinating to think I wasn’t even going to make it to 200, let alone in one last try, somehow and someway I managed to lift 25 more pounds along the way! I guess, although I didn’t set out to have that specific number in mind, I approached the lift in such a way that allowed me to feel that my magic number is 200, and anything else I managed to pull off the ground was bonus. This gave me a goal, but not the limitation towards talking myself out of doing more if I was physically able to do so.

Additionally this week, our concept mapping project was a great one; I am now able to reflect upon and see that there is a difference when goal setting for motivational goals, versus task related goals (Locke, 1996). For example, the harder the goal we set, the greater we feel when we are able to achieve this (Locke, 1996), and likewise, the more specific the goal we set, the easier it is for us to regulate our behaviors and actions, as well as evaluate our efforts towards the goal (Locke, 1996). However, it is not enough just to set a specific goal and make sure it is challenging, we have to be willing to encompass “techniques for coaching and providing feedback” (Milwaukee County).

Feedback is going to be essential, not just in our professional lives as emerging leaders, but also our personal lives as we encounter we wish to encounter ongoing growth and change. Feedback, when done correctly, is a mutual give and take exchange of information between two people, not just a manager and subordinate (Milwaukee County). Feedback can actually reduce ambiguity, retrain focus, help coach and develop others, as well as “identify what is blocking the employee from goal attainment” (Milwaukee County). From this week forward, I think it would be impossible for me to see goals and feedback as a mutually linked GPS that will help me land exactly where I am trying to be…setting my horizon in the distance and finding the optimal steps and routes to take to get there. The GPS not only shows where you are going, but where you have been, what route you have taken along the way to get where you are going, and how much farther you have until you reach your ideal destination.

I do agree that Brown’s generational theory holds water based upon personal experience. Where I am chomping at the bit as a member of Generation-X to have people show me, tell me, explain to me, more and more…I have found that the older we get, the more set in our ways we are. This hesitation or ignorance that some of us experience (maybe intolerance is more appropriate) comes from doing things over and over and over again the same way, and when nobody is giving us feedback regarding it, we think or feel we are doing great things, otherwise, wouldn’t have someone mentioned it years ago?

Although I am big enough to admit that my need for feedback comes from a performance driven metric and an internal desire to please and impress others for approval, I realize that not everyone wants to be told along the way, “hey…you may do better if you…”. I realize that it is mostly in the approach and need for consistency, but at the end of the day, I think I will always be one of those people that prefers to know exactly where I stand with, and in the eyes of, others.
Until we blog again!

References

Brown, D. R. (2011). An Experiential Approach to Organizational Development, Eight Edition. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Erez, M. (1977). Feedback: A Necessary Condition for the Goal Setting-Performance Relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 624-627.
Locke, E. A. (1996). Motivatin through conscious goal setting. Applied & Preventative Psychology, 117-124.
Milwaukee County. (n.d.). A Guide for Goal Setting and Employee Feedback. Milwaukee, WI.



No comments:

Post a Comment